Le mercredi 15 décembre 2010 10:09:19, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:01:32AM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> (...)
> > The idea is to check each proxy in the scope of the stats and compare
> > their bind-process mask with the current stats proxy.
> 
> I would do something simpler : only report a warning if one proxy is
> running with stats admin and with a bind-process mask which has 2 bits set
> (is not a power of 2). This is the correct condition to decide of an
> anomaly because an action will be sent to a random process.

Then it's already done like that in the patch I provided (or I missed 
something).

> If the
> administrator correctly binds his proxies to a specific process, he likely
> knows what he's doing and we should not report an annoying warning here.

OK, but I found it unsifficient. Weird configurations without any warning can 
also be annoying and cause headaches :-)
The patch is already done, I'll make some tests tomorrow and send it to you to 
decide if it has sense ;-)

-- 
Cyril Bonté

Reply via email to