May I ask what some of the acronyms in this email thread stand for RHI - AS - GSLB -
Thanks, Vivek On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Baptiste <[email protected]> wrote: > True :) > Despite short TTLs, some client would take a long time to failover. > But it's the only option unless you own your AS and you are able to > route your traffic inside it. > > rgs > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > DNS propagation can take a long time based on my experience. We have a > similar problem where we host multiple identical setups in different EC2 > availability zones. We have been thinking of having DNS entry with multiple > A records for load distribution and failover. However, that doesn't solve > the problem of OP. > > > > Vivek > > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Baptiste <[email protected]> > > Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 18:17:25 > > To: Senthil Naidu<[email protected]> > > Cc: Gene J<[email protected]>; [email protected]<[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: haproxy and multi location failover > > > > There is not (yet) a GSLB or dyndns daemon available in opensource, > > but a few DNS server could be used to emulate this feature. > > - PowerDNS + pipe backend > > - unbound + python module > > > > or yourself updating your DNS server to trigger a failover > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Senthil Naidu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> hi, > >> > >> we need to have a setup as follows > >> > >> > >> > >> site 1 site 2 > >> > >> LB (ip 1) LB (ip 2) > >> | | > >> | | > >> srv1 srv2 srv1 srv2 > >> > >> site 1 is primary and site 2 is backup in case of site 1 LB's failure > or > >> failure of all the servers in site1 the website should work from backup > >> location servers. > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Gene J <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Please provide more detail about what you are hosting and what you > want to > >>> achieve with multiple sites. > >>> > >>> -Eugene > >>> > >>> On Nov 1, 2011, at 9:58, Senthil Naidu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> thanks for the reply, if the same needs to be done with dns do we need > >>> any external dns services our we can use our own ns1 and ns2 for the > same. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Baptiste <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Do you want to failover the Frontend or the Backend? > >>>> If this is the frontend, you can do it through DNS or RHI (but you > >>>> need your own AS). > >>>> If this is the backend, you have nothing to do: adding your servers in > >>>> the conf in a separated backend, using some ACL to take failover > >>>> decision and you're done. > >>>> > >>>> cheers > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Senthil Naidu < > [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > Hi, > >>>> > > >>>> > Is it possible to use haproxy in a active/passive failover scenario > >>>> > between > >>>> > multiple datacenters. > >>>> > > >>>> > Regards > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
