On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 04:12:43PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > However if we see a much higher performance level by using the native API, > > we'd probably write a 3rd data layer dedicated to yassl, and would probably > > rename the current SSL data layer so that we can choose the one we want at > > build time. > > Ok, thats great. > > I have another comment about yassl: It seems that CyaSSL, the ANSI C based > edition of yaSSL is recommended over yasll (see [1]). For example TLS1.2 > doesn't seem to be supported on yasll yet, while CyaSSL already supports it. > I do not have any programming knowlegde, so please execuse my probably stupid > question, but whats the reason to impement yasll instead of CyaSSL? Can't > a C-lib be implemented in a C++ application?
In fact when I say "yassl", I really mean "CyaSSL". Regards, Willy
