Thanks :)
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Baptiste <bed...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hop, here it is: > > http://blog.exceliance.fr/2013/04/22/client-ip-persistence-or-source-ip-hash-load-balancing/ > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Baptiste <bed...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are pros and cons about source IP persistence and source IP > > hashing load-balancing. > > > > This is fun cause this morning, I thought it should deserve an article > > on my company's blog! > > I'll write it today and paste the link here. > > Hopefully it will help you. > > > > Baptiste > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Daniel Schultze <king...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Would it be possible to use "balance source" as a crude form of sharing > an > >> IP stick table? > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Lukas Tribus <luky...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Dan, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Is there a feature in 1.4 to share a sticky table between two or more > >>> > instances of haproxy. > >>> > >>> Not in 1.4. There is a feature available in 1.5 (-dev) to do this [1]. > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Lukas > >>> > >>> [1] http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#3.5 > >> > >> >
