On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:15:00AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Keith, > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:39:12AM +0000, keith anderson wrote: > > Benjamin Polidore <polidore@...> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > sorry, this is 1.5 dev 14. > > > > > > thanks.On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Benjamin Polidore > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > src/proxy.c:46: error: initializer element is not constant > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Willy, > > > > It seems that this issue has crept into the latest haproxy-1.5-dev18 > > release. > > indeed :-( > > I'm CCing Simon and Marc-Antoine who last included stdbool. We fixed this > already in the past, so I have now added a notice about this in the readme.
Sorry about that. Is the implication that bool, true and false shouldn't be used in haproxy? > > Stdbool is not portable, it does not properly work on some OS/gcc > combinations, we need to be careful about it. > > > gcc -Iinclude -Iebtree -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing > > -fomit-frame-pointer -DFD_SETSIZE=65536 -D_REENTRANT -DTPROXY > > -DCONFIG_HAP_CRYPT -DNEED_CRYPT_H -DUSE_GETADDRINFO -DENABLE_POLL > > -DCONFIG_HAPROXY_VERSION=\"1.5-dev18\" -DCONFIG_HAPROXY_DATE=\"2013/04/03\" > > -c -o src/checks.o src/checks.c > > In file included from src/checks.c:28: > > /usr/include/stdbool.h:42:2: #error "Use of <stdbool.h> is valid only in a > > c99 compilation environment." > > gmake: *** [src/checks.o] Error 1 > > > > Blindly removing the #include <stdbool.h> from checks.c and > > haproxy-systemd-wrapper.c does get a binary compilation but also an > > (unsurprisingly) eventual core dump. > > It should not cause any error, the stdbool you pointed were not used at > all, so you're facing a different error. > > Would you please download the latest snapshot, we fixed a number of bugs > that may or may not be responsible for this. If you still get the core, > please run it through gdb and issue a "bt full" so that we can get an > idea of what is causing it. At least it works on my old Ultra5 under > solaris 8. > > Thanks, > Willy >
