On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:25:47PM +0530, Sachin Shetty wrote: > Yes, no-queue is what I am looking for. If consistent hashing is easier to > accommodate this change,
I wouldn't say it's easier, better that it's less complicated :-/ > I won't mind switching to consistent hashing when > the fix is available. Right now with no support for maxqueue failover, > consistent hashing is even more severe for our use case. OK, I'll think about this. I can't provide any ETA though. Willy
