Hi Lukas, On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 06:04:37PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-26#section-6.5.7 > > Admittedly though the original specification does leave more room for > interpretation than the updated one: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-10.4.9 > > Good to see that those things are more strictly defined (and better explained) > in the newer RFCs/drafts. That makes it easier for us when reporting RFC > violations to our beloved vendors.
Yes, and the nice part is that the beloved vendors have contributed fairly honnestly to this spec update, most likely because they're the first victim of their own lack of compliance. Cheers, Willy
