Hi!
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 11:54:56AM +0200, John-Paul Bader wrote:
>> Hey Willy,
>>
>>
>> I have just applied the patch and will run another test after lunch.
>> Since we're testing with live traffic I can't leave it unattended :)
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, is this a bug that affects also Linux or is it
>> FreeBSD specific?
>
> It's generic. And after I found it, I searched how I could reproduce it
> and found it could happen on out of memory condition. So I started
> "haproxy -m 8" on linux and injected traffic. Bingo, segfault and exact
> same trace as yours :-)
>
> We were recently stumped to discover a crash of haproxy on an ALOHA,
> and we couldn't explain it, it was in relation with a high memory
> usage with SSL. Now I know where it was, so we'll issue an update :-)
>
> Thanks again for all your traces and tests!
> Willy
Can the 100% cpu load initially reported along with the segfaults be
explained by the unsupported process shared mutex on FreeBSD, btw?
Regards,
Lukas
