On 6/09/2014 12:00 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
> If you're going to come up with a ridiculous analogy, you might as well
> get it right. For your analogy to work, you would also have to keep in
> mind that the people that are being shot at have actually signed up to
> be shot at, just like you signed up to be on the mailing list.

I signed up to a mailing list for haproxy - not to be a spam sink. I
can't believe that in this day and age people actually make excuses for
this...

> It wouldn't be a simple task for Willy to take over moderating a mailing
> list, and with all of the work he does on HAProxy, I think some of you
> could be a bit more appreciative of everything he does. I'm sure if
> someone were to volunteer to help tackle this problem, that he'd be more
> than willing to consider alternate options.

Yes, yes it is a simple task. I run many mailing lists - both private
and public - and NONE get spam through to them. Previously, it was
mentioned that the subscriber to poster count was a massively different
ratio - and with all the spam that flows via here, I don't have any
problem believing that - but I do wonder what it would be like if action
was actually taken to not be a spam sink.

I am actually taking some effort to bring the topic up... If I didn't
think the list was valuable, I'd have just unsubscribed weeks ago...

> 
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Steven Haigh <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     On 5/09/2014 11:46 PM, Kobus Bensch wrote:
>     > On 05/09/2014 11:17, Lukas Tribus wrote:
>     >>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Steven Haigh <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>     >>>> Hi guys,
>     >>>>
>     >>>> I've noticed that this list seems to get more spam than I've ever
>     >>>> experienced before on any mailing list.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Is there anyone administrating this list? Is spamassassin used on
>     >>>> the list?
>     >>>>
>     >>>> --
>     >>>> Steven Haigh
>     >>> Hi Steven,
>     >>>
>     >>> It's a common asked question:
>     >>>
>     
> https://www.google.fr/search?q=haproy+formilux+spam&oq=haproy+formilux+spam
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> Baptiste
>     >>
>     >> I know that people have strong opinions about this which is why
>     previous
>     >> discussions have been a bit "tense", but I think we will have to
>     discuss
>     >> this again sooner or later.
>     >>
>     >> I got 16 SPAM mails through the ML in the last 12 hours (and 3 valid
>     >> post),
>     >> and the trend in the last weeks shows that this is getting worse.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Now, having a some antispam solution in front of the ML requires
>     >> maintenance
>     >> and will inevitably lead to false positives, thats probably not what
>     >> we want
>     >> or have the resources to do.
>     >>
>     >> Restricting the list to subscribed user (subonlypost) is not a
>     good thing
>     >> either, however if the alternative is that important topics (from
>     both
>     >> subscribed and not subscribed users) are buried in tens of SPAM
>     threads
>     >> every day, I think its a small price to pay.
>     >>
>     >> just my two cents,
>     >>
>     > Here is my 2 cents. The amount of spam I receive through this list is
>     > far, and I mean FAR outweighed by the valuable information that I get
>     > from posts as they currently come in. Besides, any spam I get, is
>     > handled by our MTA/Spam server anyway. So I think I received around 5 in
>     > the last 10 days. The one or 2 emails that do come through, or that I
>     > dont get, is dealt with pretty swiftly with either a lightning click of
>     > the Delete button, or a restore from spam. whichever be required for the
>     > appropriate action.
> 
>     I should also be able to walk around town shooting at people.... Its
>     easy enough for people to buy a bullet proof vest... If they don't have
>     one, its their problem...
> 
>     Its the wrong way to look at it... Why waste thousands of CPU cycles
>     across thousands of machines worldwide because we're too stubborn to fix
>     the problem at the source?
> 
>     --
>     Steven Haigh
> 
>     Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Web: http://www.crc.id.au
>     Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
>     Fax: (03) 8338 0299
> 
> 

-- 
Steven Haigh

Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to