Willy, I will post results when available.
-- Evgeniy On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:54:13PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote: >> this is server with 2x Intel I350-T4 1G Quad port NICs, where on first >> card each NIC is connected to uplink provider and 2nd NIC 4 ports are >> used for trunk interface with lacp connected to internal 1Gb switch >> with lacp configured as well. I've tested uplinks and internal link >> with iperf and was able to see at least 900Mbps for TCP tests. > > You may want to retry without LACP. A long time ago on Linux, the bonding > driver used not to propagate NIC-specific optimizations and resulted in > worse performance sometimes than without. Also I don't know if you're > using VLANs, and I don't know if openbsd supports checksum offloading > on VLANs, but that could as well be something which limits the list of > possible optimizations/offloadings that normally result in lower CPU > usage. > >> Card seems to be OK. Haproxy definitely needs to be moved to separate >> servers in inside network. > > Makes sense. Then make sure to use a distro with a kernel 3.10 or above, > that's where you'll get the best performance. > >> Btw, where Pavlos reported his test results? There in list or somewhere else? > > It was posted one or two weeks ago on this list, yes. I must say I was > quite happy to see someone else post results in the order of magnitude > I encounter in my own tests, because at least I won't be suspected of > cheating anymore :-) > > Cheers, > Willy > -- -- With regards, Eugene Sudyr
