> On 29 сент. 2015 г., at 23:06, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:59:15PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>>> I *think* that getaddrinfo() provides this. You can try to build by
>>> adding USE_GETADDRINFO=1 to your makefile. It's not enabled by default
>>> because there are numerous bogus implementations on various systems.
>>> If it works for you it could be the best solution as other programs
>>> which work are likely using it. I don't know if it's safe to enable
>>> it by default on FreeBSD.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I do have this enabled:
>>
>> Build options :
>> TARGET = freebsd
>> CPU = generic
>> CC = cc
>> CFLAGS = -O2 -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fstack-protector
>> -DFREEBSD_PORTS
>> OPTIONS = USE_GETADDRINFO=1 USE_ZLIB=1 USE_OPENSSL=1 USE_STATIC_PCRE=1
>> USE_PCRE_JIT=1
>
> Then I have no idea how other programs retrieve the information allowing
> them to respect your system-global choices :-(
The following patch fixes the problem for me:
--- standard.c.orig 2015-09-30 13:28:52.688425000 +0300
+++ standard.c 2015-09-30 13:29:00.826968000 +0300
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static struct sockaddr_storage *str2ip(c
memset(&hints, 0, sizeof(hints));
hints.ai_family = sa->ss_family ? sa->ss_family : AF_UNSPEC;
hints.ai_socktype = SOCK_DGRAM;
- hints.ai_flags = AI_PASSIVE;
+ hints.ai_flags = 0;
hints.ai_protocol = 0;
if (getaddrinfo(str, NULL, &hints, &result) == 0) {
FreeBSD manual page for getaddrinfo() is uncertain how to treat AI_PASSIVE when
hostname parameter is non-NULL (and this parameter is always non-NULL in
standard.c:str2ip()).
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=getaddrinfo&sektion=3
On Linux manual page explicitly states that "If node is not NULL, then the
AI_PASSIVE flag is ignored."
So this change should be harmless for Linux.
What do you think?
