On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:57:40PM +0800, Ruoshan Huang wrote: > > > On Dec 4, 2015, at 2:41 AM, Bryan Talbot <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > rspdel is older and remains for backwards compatibility. > > if so, maybe the document should flag those directives `deprecated` :)
Good point! Would you be willing to propose your first patch to address this ? reqadd, reqdel, reqdeny, reqallow, rspadd, rspdel, rspdeny, rspallow are directly concerned. It would be nice to add a "see also" with their respective alternatives (http-request XYZ, http-response XYZ). Please take a look at the "CONTRIBUTING" file to know how to proceed. Thanks, Willy
