On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:22:54AM +0200, Janusz Dziemidowicz wrote: > 2016-04-09 2:15 GMT+02:00 Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:15:22PM +0200, Janusz Dziemidowicz wrote: > >> 2016-04-07 17:47 GMT+02:00 Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>: > >> > If someone who can reliably reproduce the issue could check whether 1.6 > >> > has > >> > the same issue, it would help me cut the problem in half. That obviously > >> > excludes all those running sensitive production of course. > >> > >> I can try to test 1.6 next week and see what happens. > > > > Wow that could be great if you could, thanks Janusz! > > I've upgraded one of my servers to haproxy 1.6.4. So far no problems > and CPU usage seems ok.
Thanks Janusz. I've looked at the code this week-end in 1.5 and am having doubts about certain points. I need to compare with 1.6 and see whether there are different assumptions in 1.5 than in 1.6 regarding the buffer length controls. Willy
