I'd be happy if i could just manually select 2 or more backends and hit
apply once.

On Dec 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "David Harrigan" <[email protected]> wrote:

> FYI, here is the patch:
>
> From 218a6c42d47ccf2d8970e1d332c91429a2c34bbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Harrigan <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:12:49 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] MINOR: stats: Support "select all" for backend actions
>
> Allow the user to quickly select all servers within a group before
> invoking an
> action.
> ---
>  src/stats.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/stats.c b/src/stats.c
> index 497aa477..d5fcec82 100644
> --- a/src/stats.c
> +++ b/src/stats.c
> @@ -636,7 +636,8 @@ static int stats_dump_fields_html(struct chunk *out,
> const struct field *stats,
>
>   if (flags & ST_SHOWADMIN)
>   chunk_appendf(out,
> -              "<td><input type=\"checkbox\" name=\"s\"
> value=\"%s\"></td>",
> +              "<td><input class='%s-checkbox' type=\"checkbox\"
> name=\"s\" value=\"%s\"></td>",
> +              field_str(stats, ST_F_PXNAME),
>                field_str(stats, ST_F_SVNAME));
>
>   chunk_appendf(out,
> @@ -1642,7 +1643,12 @@ static void stats_dump_html_px_hdr(struct
> stream_interface *si, struct proxy *px
>
>   if ((px->cap & PR_CAP_BE) && px->srv && (appctx->ctx.stats.flags &
> STAT_ADMIN)) {
>   /* Column heading for Enable or Disable server */
> - chunk_appendf(&trash, "<th rowspan=2 width=1></th>");
> +        chunk_appendf(&trash,
> +                "<th rowspan=2 width=1><input type=\"checkbox\" \
> +                onclick=\"for(c in 
> document.getElementsByClassName('%s-checkbox'))
> \
> +                
> document.getElementsByClassName('%s-checkbox').item(c).checked
> = this.checked\"></th>",
> +                px->id,
> +                px->id);
>   }
>
>   chunk_appendf(&trash,
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>
> -=david=-
>
> --
> I prefer encrypted and signed messages.
> Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9
>
> No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however, a number of
> electrons were inconvenienced.
>

Reply via email to