On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 01:28:06PM +0000, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > This change is rather dangerous. It's not unlikely that people will have > multiple config files in their `/etc/haproxy` directory. Such might > happen if users keep backups of previous versions when they make a > change, or if they have alternate configs for different purposes.
Confirmed, that's exactly my case, and I know places where there are configs suffixed with the date and trigram of the people having touched them. We must definitely not do what is proposed here! > In > general when applications support loading multiple config files, the > configs are typically put in a `.d` directory, such as > `/etc/haproxy/conf.d`. Yes and people are used to be careful about "conf.d" directories. Thanks, Willy
