On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:27:47PM +0200, Nenad Merdanovic wrote: > Gil, > > On 04/05/2017 10:02 AM, Gil Bahat wrote: > > Hey Nenad, > > > > did anything come out of this? interestingly enough, some compliance > > challenges I was facing brought this to mind again. > > Sadly I didn't have any time to work on this. I did check a bit and > found the maps interface somewhat counter-intuitive to use here, so I > went down the route of adding support for socket "manually" (same way > OCSP and TLS tickets are done). > > Maybe I'll have time this weekend to finish it. Would you perhaps prefer > I send the patches that implement this immediately for Willy to merge > and then add the socket-related functionality later (as with Olivier's > patches it is less critical)?
Nenad, no rush. We're all busy finishing and merging pending stuff, so spending your week-end on this may end up with your patches being merged at the end of next week and you'd be disappointed. Just keep in mind that your patch will be welcome and revisit it when you have some time. We counted that it's expected to arrive in the next few months, so don't worry. Thanks! Willy
