Hi Christopher, A quick followup from this morning.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:41 AM William Dauchy <w.dau...@criteo.com> wrote: > it seems better now, but not completely gone, in a way, I think we now > have a new issue. > this morning, on one test machine I have a process which remains polling > traffic so it exited after a while: Jun 21 12:04:18 haproxy[745]: [WARNING] 171/120413 (745) : Former worker 30845 exited with code 0 I don't know why it took so much time to exit (~ 5 hours). Any hint? Best, -- William
