On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:24:16AM +0100, flecai...@haproxy.com wrote:
> reg-tests/http-capture/h00000.vtc | 92
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nice one, thanks Fred, now merged!
I'd be careful regarding expectations on log lines about stuff
that may evolve over time like the size below :
> + expect ~ "[^:\\[ ]\\[${h_pid}\\]: .* .* fe be/srv .* 200 17641 - - ----
> .* .* {HPhx8n59qjjNBLjP} {htb56qDdCcbRVTfS} \"GET / HTTP/1\\.1\""
^^^^^
Since haproxy logs the exact byte count it received including headers,
and the status line, this may easily vary over time with minor changes
to varnishtest or to haproxy's muxes. I think that for such ones where
the exact could is neither predicted nor important, using a regex with
the order of magnitude should be enough and more robust over time (eg:
1 followed by 4 digits).
Thanks!
Willy
