On 17 Dec 06:58, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 06:08:56AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > But now I'm starting to suspect that most of the problem comes from the > > fact that people who used to rely on regex in the past will not as easily > > perform their rewrites using set-path as they would using a replace rule > > which is very similar to the old set. So probably we'd need to introduce > > a "replace-path" action and suggest it in the warning emitted for reqrep. > > > > I think it is important that we properly address such needs and am > > willing to backport anything like this to 2.1 to ease the transition if > > that's the best solution. > > What about this ? It does exactly what's needed for me. It's self-contained > enough that we could get it backported to 2.1 and maybe even to 2.0 (though > it would require some adaptations to legacy mode there). > > Willy
I am in favour of replace-path. Should we have a replace-domain or so for the first part of the abs url? -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Open-Source Consultant V_/_ Inuits - https://www.inuits.eu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
