Hi Илья, I will do it sometimes this week!
Regards, Martin On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 11:40 AM Илья Шипицин <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, Martin! > > Can you please compare load profiles using google perftools ? > > I never tried to use gperf on ARM64, also, my trial at Linaro is over, I > do not have an access to any ARM64 anymore. > in short, gperf can be found https://github.com/gperftools/gperftools > > please follow "CPU profiling part". > > it can collect cachegrind output, I attached example kcachegrind report > (you can sort by "self" time). > it would be interesting to compare amd64 <--> arm64 > > [image: Screenshot from 2020-07-18 13-35-27.png] > > > пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 19:00, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>: > >> Hello HAProxy community, >> >> I wanted to compare how the newly released HAProxy 2.2 (Congrats!) >> behaves under heavy load so I've ran some tests on my x86_64 and aarch64 >> VMs: >> >> >> https://medium.com/@martin.grigorov/compare-haproxy-performance-on-x86-64-and-arm64-cpu-architectures-bfd55d1d5566 >> >> Without much surprise the x86_64 VM gave better results! >> >> It is *not* a real use case scenario: the backends serve on GET / and >> return "Hello World", without any file/network operations. >> >> What is interesting though is that I can get 120-160K reqs/sec when >> hitting directly one of the backend servers, and only 20-40K reqs/sec when >> using HAProxy as a load balancer in front of them. >> >> I'd be happy to re-run the tests with any kind of improvements you may >> have! >> >> Regards, >> Martin >> >
