Am 14.10.20 um 15:29 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> As previously discussed above, we can probably keep monitor-uri for now
> as it works. It's not the most elegant thing in the code but replacing
> it will be at least as annoying for some users as it is to keep it in
> the code. Probably that we could update the doc to encourage use of
> http-request return though. If someone has a good proposal that does
> both monitor-uri and monitor-fail in one line, that would be nice (e.g.
> maybe with Tim's new "iif").

I believe I already said it somewhere: The most valuable thing about
monitor-uri is that it does not create entries within the access log. I
don't think that can be replicated with http-request return as of now,
but I am happy to learn otherwise.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus

Reply via email to