Willy, Am 14.10.20 um 15:29 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > As previously discussed above, we can probably keep monitor-uri for now > as it works. It's not the most elegant thing in the code but replacing > it will be at least as annoying for some users as it is to keep it in > the code. Probably that we could update the doc to encourage use of > http-request return though. If someone has a good proposal that does > both monitor-uri and monitor-fail in one line, that would be nice (e.g. > maybe with Tim's new "iif").
I believe I already said it somewhere: The most valuable thing about monitor-uri is that it does not create entries within the access log. I don't think that can be replicated with http-request return as of now, but I am happy to learn otherwise. Best regards Tim Düsterhus
