On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 03:29:58PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 03:24:19PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 08:55:13PM +0500, ???? ??????? wrote: > > > I was mistaken. LibreSSL does not like parallel install > > > > > > libressl fails on `make -j4 install` · Issue #461 · > > > libressl-portable/portable (github.com) > > > <https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/issues/461> > > > > > > > > > anyway, if CI works, I'm ok with changes > > > > OK I've applied the change to use build_sw on openssl only (libressl > > doesn't have it), and -j$(nproc) for this phase for openssl on linux > > (will likely be 2). Let's see. > > Hmmm it fails with 1.0.2, there's no build_sw there. In addition I do > remember that 1.0.2 used to require significant patches to be reliable > under make -j. > > Let's wait for the remaining tests to conclude.
OK that's a net win, openssl-3.0.0-alpha17 dropped from 8'29 to 2'55. I've just excluded versions 1.x from both the parallel build and the build_sw target and that's good now. Willy
