Hi, Yes, it does make sense. The original issue actually pertains to making the messages uniform. To do this, a better approach is to see the individual .c files. Each one of then have a different format of the error message and try to unify those.
Thanks, Suvarna 'SuvP' Pattayil On Fri, 24 Sep, 2021, 7:10 pm Willy Tarreau, <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 05:23:01PM +0200, PR Bot wrote: > > Dear list! > > > > Author: SuvP <suvarna...@gmail.com> > > Number of patches: 1 > > > > This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: > > Using standard 'OOM' instead of 'Out of Memory' > > > > Patch title(s): > > Using standard 'OOM' instead of 'Out of Memory' > > Thanks but no, I'm sorry, I'd even do the opposite. While "OOM" is > commonly known to system developers or sysadmins, it's not always > something trivial to other users, especially those coming from a > network background where this is not something common at all, and > who have to deal with load balancers. We try to make our error > messages clear to help people quickly fix an issue without having > to search for an explanation on the net, and I'm definitely against > this change for this reason. > > Thanks, > Willy >
