Hi Phil,

Many thanks.

I wonder if we should rather have a 'harbour-1.0.0'
(or similar, with an agreed version number), and we
should simply release RC1 -> RC2 -> RCn by doing
updates inside this one branch, rather than having
separate branches for all sub-releases of 1.0.0.

Brgds,
Viktor

On 2008.06.04., at 7:17, Phil Barnett wrote:

I updated the following files

Sending        [harbour]/ChangeLog
Sending        [harbour]/doc/whatsnew.txt
Sending        [harbour]/harbour.spec
Sending        [harbour]/include/hbver.h
Transmitting file data ....
Committed revision 8597.

I have no idea how or how long the version has been at 1.1.1, but it is now
0.9.9-RC1. When we get to 1.0, it will change to 1.0.0

In SVN, tagging is simply a copy operation, so I placed the tag with the
following command:

$ svn copy
https://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/harbour-project/trunk/harbour
https://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/harbour-project/trunk/harbour-RC1

Committed revision 8598.

So, I believe you can all start working on the new RC1 image by changing your
co directory to the new directory.

Let me know if I did something stupid.

--
Waiting for sunspots.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to