On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Massimo Belgrano <[email protected]>wrote:
> Agree all your assertionso i revise: > bcc is only most used in windows with [x]harbour (due to last 10 year) > Why not write in the upcoming harbour website mingw as suggested harbour > compiler for win32? > any opinion? > We can make such recommendation, or even better give a priority list of compilers / platforms supported by Harbour. I've posted one such possible priority at around release 1.0. This way we may gently shift focus on the long run. The benefit is of the users' for the most part, Harbour's benefit is some potential quality image gain, by picking and supporting good quality, standard external tools. >From a development POV, all this doesn't really matter, as it's highly unlikely that support for any of the widely used compilers would suddenly be dropped. This wouldn't make any sense anyway, since this is an OSS project. Brgds, Viktor
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
