I'd rather stick with hbmk, it's a quite commonly used name since long, many ppl know it. hbm doesn't tell much about the purpose.
You can create any kind of alias locally. I use hbvc, hbbc, hbmi wrappers which set the environments and call hbmk, for example. Brgds, Viktor On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Massimo Belgrano <[email protected]>wrote: > I still prefer a short name like hbm > > > 2009/2/17 Francesco Saverio Giudice <[email protected]>: > > Hi Viktor, > > > > faster than my hands :-) > > I was just writing about it. > > It seems to me that it is a good choice for the moment. > > I think that you could also add hbcc.bat, hbcmp.bat and hblnk.bat to > route > > options in hidden way and have same names of linux version. > > If do you think that it could be useful. > > > > Best regards > > > > Francesco > > > > Il 17/02/2009 16.36, [email protected] ha scritto: > >> > >> 2009-02-17 16:40 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Harbour mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour >
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
