Well Are you the chief commander If is good for you is good for all
2009/2/17 Viktor Szakáts <[email protected]>: > I'd rather stick with hbmk, it's a quite commonly > used name since long, many ppl know it. hbm doesn't > tell much about the purpose. > You can create any kind of alias locally. I use hbvc, > hbbc, hbmi wrappers which set the environments > and call hbmk, for example. > Brgds, > Viktor > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Massimo Belgrano <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I still prefer a short name like hbm >> >> >> 2009/2/17 Francesco Saverio Giudice <[email protected]>: >> > Hi Viktor, >> > >> > faster than my hands :-) >> > I was just writing about it. >> > It seems to me that it is a good choice for the moment. >> > I think that you could also add hbcc.bat, hbcmp.bat and hblnk.bat to >> > route >> > options in hidden way and have same names of linux version. >> > If do you think that it could be useful. >> > >> > Best regards >> > >> > Francesco >> > >> > Il 17/02/2009 16.36, [email protected] ha scritto: >> >> >> >> 2009-02-17 16:40 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Harbour mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Harbour mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > > _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
