In defence of Trac: It's the _only_ wiki we have.Trac is extremely useful to track changes and events and integrate it with ticket tracking. Latter is for internal usage only, not for the public.
For the public we have the only one on sf.net. I agree with the rest. Brgds, Viktor On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Lorenzo Fiorini <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Viktor Szakáts <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm not sure what you have in mind as possible benefits. > > Registering is no problem for me, but we already have > > bug tracking on sf.net (in fact even two of them, because > > Trac also has one integrated), so having another one > > on another site would split the information, which isn't > > very good IMO. > > If it's only registering, it looks okay. Any other opinion? > > IMHO these"activities" are useless, dangerous and disturbing. > Who will be in charge to update these sites, wikis, bugtracks and so on? > And what will be written there? In which languages? > > There is nothing more "sad" than a not updated site or than a bug > report without reply, or than an empty "social page". > > Just my personal opinion of course. > > best regards, > Lorenzo > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour >
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
