owatcom seems also okay, and pocc is nice for some free x64/ARM platform testing, otherwise I agree. Let me extend the question.
Does anyone have any objection to remove this list from our supported compiler list: - win/dmc (buggy and compiler not updated) - win/xcc (based on very old version of pocc, propriatery) - win/icc (IBM VisualAge, not available for Windows anymore, and it was never tested with Harbour) IOW, can I delete these? Brgds, Viktor On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Lorenzo Fiorini <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:45 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ; NOTE: More candidates for such pruning are: > > - dmc (buggy and compiler not updated) > > - xcc (based on very old version of pocc) > > Any opinions? > > I would keep only mingw, msvc, bcc for Win and gcc for all the rest. > > Just my opinion of course. > > best regards, > Lorenzo > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour >
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
