Viktor, I don't think there is anyone left using VAC++ on OS/2 to build harbour.
Maurilio. Viktor Szakáts wrote: > And also OS/2 / icc (IBM Visual Age C++ 3.0). > > Brgds, > Viktor > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Viktor Szakáts <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > owatcom seems also okay, and pocc is nice for some free > x64/ARM platform testing, otherwise I agree. > > Let me extend the question. > > Does anyone have any objection to remove this list > from our supported compiler list: > > - win/dmc (buggy and compiler not updated) > - win/xcc (based on very old version of pocc, propriatery) > - win/icc (IBM VisualAge, not available for Windows anymore, and it > was never tested with Harbour) > > IOW, can I delete these? > > Brgds, > Viktor > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Lorenzo Fiorini > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:45 PM, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > ; NOTE: More candidates for such pruning are: > > - dmc (buggy and compiler not updated) > > - xcc (based on very old version of pocc) > > Any opinions? > > I would keep only mingw, msvc, bcc for Win and gcc for all the rest. > > Just my opinion of course. > > best regards, > Lorenzo > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour -- __________ | | | |__| Maurilio Longo |_|_|_|____| farmaconsult s.r.l. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
