Hi agree with you but think that This is one side of the problem The other side is that rewriting each times that you change gui is wasting time The right idea of gtwvg is that a unified class (compatible with xbase++ part) will allow change you with more little effert So i hope that when somebody write a wrapper for QT it will based on xbase++ class & support basic fivewin syntax) If Pritpal give this way it can resolve a lot of multiplatform effort and with Gtnet it can nearly perfect for web deployment Is qt so easy that you use a single source tree and a simple recompilation, applications can be written for Windows 98 to XP and Vista, Mac OS X, Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
2009/3/16 Angel Pais <[email protected]> > I've tried them, but test sample painted slow and did nothing. > Not tried latest improvements though. > Anyway if I'd wanted to stick whit a windows-only GUI I'd stick with > Xbase++. > What I need is a multiplatform write once-deploy anywhere GUI framework. > > Quote from QT's whitepaper... > > QT supports the development of cross-platform GUI aplications with it's > "write once, compile anywhere" aproach. Using a single source tree and a > simple recompilation, applications can be written for Windows 98 to XP and > Vista, Mac OS X, Linux, Solaris, HP-UX, and many other versions of Unix with > X11. QT applications can also be compiled to run on embedded Linux and > Windows CE plattforms. > > EndQuote > > Regards > Angel > > Massimo Belgrano escribió: > >> Hi Angel >> Thanks for explain us your Xbase++ developer POV. >> >> Regarding GUI Have you tried Pritpal's harbour\contrib\gtwvg Xbase Part >> compatible? >> Easy to switch from xbase++ and imo same test will be useful >> regarding rdd In past Przemyslaw have announced idea about native client >> server named netrdd and afaik this ideas are still present in his brain >> >> -- Massimo Belgrano
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
