Hello
Angel Pais wrote: > > I've tried them, but test sample painted slow and did nothing. > Not tried latest improvements though. > Anyway if I'd wanted to stick whit a windows-only GUI I'd stick with > Xbase++. > What I need is a multiplatform write once-deploy anywhere GUI framework. > Do not know what did you try. Please investigate code in harbout/contrib/gtwvg/tests/demoxbp.prg compile it as -mt -gui and see for yourself what is the difference in Xbase++ and Harbour implementation. The only different in the code is "event loop" which at this momemnt is INKEY() in Harbour vs AppEvent() in Xbase++. > Quote from QT's whitepaper... > > QT supports the development of cross-platform GUI aplications with it's > "write once, compile anywhere" aproach. Using a single source tree and a > simple recompilation, applications can be written for Windows 98 to XP > and Vista, Mac OS X, Linux, Solaris, HP-UX, and many other versions of > Unix with X11. QT applications can also be compiled to run on embedded > Linux and Windows CE plattforms. > > EndQuote > Seems interesting. Can someone points me to the directions how I can setup QT on my XP machine and what should I look into, just to save me of some time. May be I put hands on QT and Xbase++ compatible GUI modal. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-to-xBase%2B%2B-users-tp22537039p22550818.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
