On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Roberto Lopez wrote: Hi,
>> about hbmk2 can you post a little sample (also with minigui) so i will try >> Facts are that Viktor have modified each error post here regarding hbmk2 > I've explained in a post on Sunday: > http://www.hmgforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=5494#p5494 The text is clear for me but it's not clear for me what you used so far. In my opinion such functionality can be implemented only inside PP and all tools which tries to make it without replicating whole PP logic with all compiler predefined settings and macros are buggy by definitions and users can always create some code which will confuse them. HBMK2 is not an exception here (I haven't even know that it tries to make that) so I'm interesting what is your alternative and what you used so far. I can add such functionality for .prg code to Harbour compiler (GCC already have it for C code) and it's the only one place where it can be well implemented. So far only Lorenzo asked about it. If it's really important then I'll implement it but I do not understand why hbmk2 cannot be used without this feature and what is the core of problem. One of the most important hbmk2 job is hiding differences between C compilers and some Harbour internals like platform or installation dependent settings so it can be always used as simple wrapper to Harbour and C compilers and linker. The incremental mode is only additional functionality which you do not have to use. Anyhow if HBMK2 tries to detect automatically included files then it should be done correctly though I can still imagine situations when only manually created dependence list will work. BTW does HBMK2 supports dependencies list defined by user? best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
