I have no idea for a fix, I simply used cpinfo.prg to 
generate this CP without ever touching the source.

Maybe it needs HB_CP_RAW to be enabled manually?

Brgds,
Viktor

On 2009 Nov 14, at 10:19, Bisz István wrote:

> Try to compile something after the upgrade to the latest revision.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org
> [mailto:harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org] On Behalf Of Massimo Belgrano
> Sent: 2009. november 14. 10:12
> To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
> Subject: Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12868] trunk/harbour
> 
> Why "Now the repository is dead"?
> 
> 2009/11/14 Bisz István <istvan.b...@t-online.hu>:
>> Hi Pritpal,
>> 
>> Thank you for the new QPointer handling integration, now we can handle the
> QObjects deleted by Qt in his parent-child mechanism. There is a necessity
> to continue with the HB-Qt interface analysis, concentrating on the:
>> 
>> void * hbqt_gcpointer( int iParam )
>> {
>>   QGC_POINTER * p = ( QGC_POINTER * ) hb_parptrGC( gcFuncs(), iParam );
>> 
>>   if( p && p->ph )
>>   {
>>      return p->ph;
>>   }
>>   else
>>   {
>>      return hb_parptr( iParam );
>>   }
>> }
>> 
>> function enhancements, to signal at harbour level the already deleted Qt
> objects access tentative.
>> 
>> Now the repository is dead, due to the CP modifications, I will continue
> with the tests later.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> István (my first name)
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org
> [mailto:harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org] On Behalf Of Pritpal Bedi
>> Sent: 2009. november 14. 5:57
>> To: harbour@harbour-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[12868] trunk/harbour
>> 
>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> 
>> Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>>> 
>>> Now I'm getting crash on exit using MinGW + Win7.
>>> 
>> 
>> demoxbp.exe ?
>> And crash at what point? On exit ? If yes, then it is possibly that
>> 
>> HbDbfModel::~HbDbfModel( void )
>> {
>>   hb_itemRelease( block );
>>   destroy();
>> }
>> 
>> needs some overhaul. What I think is that - hb_itemRelease( block ); -
>> has to be guarded in someway, but what, I am unable to figure out.
>> Przemek can shed light on this aspect.
>> 
>> NOTE: Bisz István had disabled it to avoid crashes, but I enabled it
>>         because, otherwise, hb_out.log was containing a long list of
>>         unfreed memory blocks.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Pritpal Bedi
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/SF.net-SVN%3A-harbour-project%3A-12868--trunk-harbour-
> tp26346347p26347229.html
>> Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
>> Harbour@harbour-project.org
>> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
>> Harbour@harbour-project.org
>> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Massimo Belgrano
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to