On Thu, 04 Mar 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:

Hi,

> Could possibly be. I don't use hbsms at all, don't even 
> have a serial cable around to test it, so I hope it will 
> be "community" fixed eventually. I meant it as an 
> initiative in the first place.

Not could but for sure is.

> The last .prg I've just sent to the list has all these 
> undone, yet it doesn't work for some reason.

Please read my message again.
The bug inside tp_send() is still in the code you sent.
The condition in DO WHILE in line 322 is always FALSE
when timeout is 0.

> I'd appreciate if you could make what you think is needed.

I already gave you precise answers about the existing bug
intorduce by recent seconds()=>hb_milliSeconds() modifications
and the potential problems inside hbsms which may cause random
bug reports to this list.
It's enough you carefully read what I wrote :-)

best regards,
Przemek
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to