Joseph
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [vista-vendors] Cutting to the case regarding licenses
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:34:31 -0500
From: Joseph Dal Molin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Back to cutting to the chase....
IMHO disclosure is only half of the issue, while it is the literal interpretation of open source... it is only part of the picture. The equally if not more important part is contribution to the common code base via collaborative innovation etc. .... that is where the strategic value of open source is for health care systems and the leverage to improve health outcomes. This speaks to the core business of health care and VistA's adopters which is improving health outcomes. IP protection and comptetitive advantage etc. while important are secondary objectives..
The research and projects I have done for the Canadian federal gov't and European Commission strongly support the notion that the real innovation and power of open source is to be the designer of the "earthquake" not the victim. What this takes is alligning the license with the core mission of health care and at the same time creating innovative business models that work harmoniously with this reality....anything else will compromise improvement in health care and is IMHO indicative of a lack of "out of the box" thinking and capability on the part of those who think they are open source companies.
Cheers
Joseph
Joel West wrote:
On 9:37 AM -0800 11/20/04, Joel West doth scribe:
There are two different types of licenses requiring downstream disclosure, and one may be objectionable than the other. The GPL defines derivative works broadly and could (in a VistA context) require disclosure of modules bundled with GPL modules; the CPL, MPL, LGPL only requires disclosures of changes to the GPL module.
Sorry for the blather. Let's try again.
There are two different types of licenses requiring downstream disclosure, and one may be more objectionable than the other. The GPL defines derivative works broadly and could (in a VistA context) require disclosure of modules bundled with GPL modules; the CPL, MPL, LGPL only requires disclosures of changes to the module licensed nder the CPL, MPL or LGPL.
Yahoo! Groups Links
.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vista-vendors/<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
