|
The effect you are seeing is because you are printing multiples. The
main record's field doesn't repeat so you understand that the multiple
fields that print on each line are part of that record. If it
repeated, you wouldn't be sure if you had several records, with the
same value, and one multiple entry per record or one record with
several records in the multiple. Does that make sense? Bob Beckley wrote: Chris, you're right about the validity. I just made up the example on-the-fly. The real problem is that under the Cache/VMS environment, my FileMan report automatically suppresses consecutive duplicate values, which is very weird, since there is a FileMan print qualifier (;N) used to suppress them. I want to "un-suppress" them somehow. Please see my reply to Greg. Thanks.-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Richardson Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 7:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache Nancy; The global listed does not look like a valid Fileman Global structure, (but it is a fine MUMPS global just the same). If you are trying to access this with fileman, it may not be evaluating it the way you think. I'm kind of surprised that the global list utility does not yield the difference in the subsequent nodes. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nancy E. Anthracite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 12:43 PM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache -- Greg Kreis http://www.PioneerDataSys.com "You are today where your thoughts have brought you, you will be tomorrow where your thoughts take you." (James Lane Allen) |
- Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache Greg Kreis
- Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache Bob Beckley
