Kevin wrote:
>2. That error has disappeared. And all I did, as far
>as I can remember, was to take out a commented version
>of the original line. And while I would love to
>figure out how that caused this bug, I'm not going to
>persue it.
Whoa! It seems very likely that your inserted comment broke the whole block of
code. Did
you notice that the lines in that area of the source code all used the
dot-syntax for code
blocks. If your comment did not begin with the same number of leading dots
("."), it would
prevent the subsequent lines from being executed.
>
>3. The search still doesn't seem to work.
Did you see my note where I gave you a link to a version of ^DIS1 where I
inserted
George's fix? I tested it and the search did appear to work correctly for me.
---------------------------------------
Jim Self
Systems Architect, Lead Developer
VMTH Computer Services, UC Davis
(http://www.vmth.ucdavis.edu/us/jaself)
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
