But doesn't that require a license like the LPGL?

====
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 23, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:

The understanding I got was that we wanted to allow companies to be able to develop modules that work with VistA, and have them be propriatary.  Even on Linux, one can make a commercial program that makes use of open source technology. 
 
Kevin



------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to