Thanks Nancy. Nice site, I had forgotten it. My speed 1084K - for what its worth....t/xt
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardhats- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy Anthracite > Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 9:35 PM > To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] I've got the slow CPRS blues..... > > There area some sites that allow you to test your upload speed with you > DSL > line. This is the one that I used to test mine. Why not check out yours. > > http://performance.toast.net/ > > Then test you speed on the VA online demo. If you DSL is typical, upload > will > be about 1/6 the speed of download. If the VADemo moves quicker than > that, > then maybe there is hope that there is some sort of configuration > parameter > you can change to improve things. > > > On Saturday 07 May 2005 11:09 pm, Thurman Pedigo wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardhats- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Toppenberg > > > Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 8:08 PM > > > To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net > > > Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] I've got the slow CPRS blues..... > > > > > > --- Thurman Pedigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ... There was a time I ran POTS and 56k modem with > > > > excellent performance. > > > > <tlp> This was 1991 FileMan Telnet connection - not CPRS > > > > Kevin Toppenberg wrote: > > > Hmmm... I am having a hard time figuring out all this > > > bandwidth stuff. We are also running a billing > > > software package which could be eating up all the > > > bandwidth. Someone suggested that I set up some > > > bandwidth monitoring. This is really what I need to > > > do. But I'm not quite sure how to do it. Currently > > > our confuration is like this: > > > DSL modem-->VPN firewall/router-->PC's > > > > <tlp> My experience is software VPN chews up a LOT of bandwidth - I > think > > hardware VPN as with a firewall may a lot faster. Hopefully, I will know > > soon. > > > > > I think that to run sophisticated monitoring, I would > > > need to insert a linux box with two network cards > > > between the DSL modem and the VPN firewall. > > > > Or maybe just tracert if you haven't already- be sure you know the > timing, > > and where the signal is going. Hopefully, VPN does control that. > > > > > But if you were able to run one copy of CPRS on a 56k > > > line, that's pretty good. But were you running CPRS > > > from home (which I doubt because of that pesky > > > no-CPRS-through-a-NAT/router-problem), or were you > > > running something like PC Anywhere remote desktop > > > software? > > > > <tlp> > > Microsoft Remote Desktop. Every client, office or remote location > connects > > via remote desktop. See below for server connection notes. > > > > >The bandwidth requirements for these two > > > programs might be quite different. > > > > <tlp> > > We have a "nailed down" T1 (1.55mbps) office to home. I little more > > expensive, though totally secure, therefore "home" is behind the office > > firewall. I do have a router with a CSU/DSU on each end (other > > configurations available). It costs a few more bucks. However, it is the > > most trouble free point-to-point connection going. No need for added > > firewall, VPN, or other security overhead. Nor does it care what > software > > you use. > > > > I think I recall you have something over 40,000 patients in your > database. > > What is not clear to me is whether you have the same problem with only a > > few patients, or did you bring the remote site up after the database was > > fully populated? I don't have my db fully populated, though I see > nothing > > to suggest it will be appreciably slower. Certainly, the CPRS page > > refreshes at a very nice rate. > > > > We connect to the server via "remote desktop", so VISTA/CPRS thinks > > everyone it talks to resides on the server. I also wonder if that > 1.55mbps > > would be a lot slower if there were over three people at one time on it > > (our most to date)...tx/t > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. > > Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, > 4 > > opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to > > win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > Hardhats-members mailing list > > Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members > > -- > Nancy Anthracite > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. > Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 > opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to > win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 > _______________________________________________ > Hardhats-members mailing list > Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
