I don't disagree, but people won't use a tehnology because the only alternative is paper. We still need to ask how we can make the software usable (and useful) for health care professionals, and then produce software that meets their needs. If a product is painful to use, people will avoid using it, no matter how logical the arguments you or I can muster as to why they "should" use it might seem.
--- Ruben Safir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Generally the systems that have been built are not good. But, > nothing > is worse than paper and the medication error rates and the billions > of > dollars in costs due to injury make that crystal clear. > > Ruben > "The most profound technologies are those that disappear." --Mark Weiser ==== Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
