On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 14:00 -0400, Nancy Anthracite wrote: > Well, since it doesn't exist yet, it is moot, but when it does it will be > thoroughly tested and at that point, then it can be presented. It would be > the intention to pass Class I testing.
I can't think discussing something that you would be spending money on is moot. I guess the question is how much money do you think it would cost to get something that would "pass Class I testing" and allow you to comfortably suggest and support it. I would think it is more money than makes sense to get a solution that is in no way viable in the long term. I mean, you get CPRS running once, great, now every update to CPRS you have to fix bugs that are introduced, and you don't have the ability to easily add more features and functionality to the client. These are all things we looked into before investing our time and energy in a clean version of CPRS that already runs cross-platform, speaks over SOAP + HTTPS, and be easily translatable. Just trying to add a different perspective to the matter at hand. --Todd ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
