On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 09:12 -0400, Jim Drash wrote: > There are no "real" loopholes in GPL. Let me run through an example. >
Dude. Did you even read the article? It clearly states that competitors are using his GPLd code, with modifications, but selling it as an appliance, thus not distributing a 'binary', thus not having to contribute their changes or their derivative works back. That is a loophole. And yes. The GPL has that one, and a couple other subtle ones. Believe it or not, its not perfect. --Todd ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
