On 11/4/05, Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 4, 2005, at 10:42 AM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
>
> Before I work on this, does any such functionality already exist?
> By the way, I don't know if I've mentioned it on this list, but one idea
> I've been exploring is "Functional Fileman" and achieving referential
> transparency would be one of the biggest reasons for wanting to develop such
> a thing. More specifically, I'm thinking about the possibility of turning
> MUMPS globals into a monad. Monads are kinds of functors that effectively
> control the way imperative bits of code (like destructive updates) are used
> so as not to violate transparency.
>
> I know most people on this list are focused on the product as it is, and
> these kinds of musings are not always appreciated, but the amount of time
> I've spent chasing dependencies is one of the things that has gotten me to
> think along these lines.

Its not a matter of not appreciating as much as not understanding. 
Sorry, but your understanding of computer theory is several orders of
magnitude greater than mine!

For example, I am not able to follow what a monad would be, or how it
would be different etc etc.  So I don't really know what to say.

Kevin



>
> ===
> Gregory Woodhouse
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "You can't win if you don't finish the race."
> --Richard Petty
>
>
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to