Never trust anyone other than people dealing with the boards in volume "stable & faster than Asus" would make me question the methods of testing and does not speak to the repeat quality of a brand.

My vote is for Asus as a brand, than maybe of the other common brands you guys post here like MSI & gigabyte without getting "micro" on the individual models.

Disclaimer: at some point 8-10 years ago got burnt using DFI stuff for the OEM where I worked. YMMV & it's your ass.

Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 07:40 PM 13/04/2005, rls wrote:

I have only heard good things about DFI. When I was looking for my dual Xeon
board surfed a bunch of locations and the consensus 6 months ago from the
locations I visited was that they were more stable than Asus and ran faster
at standard clock speeds.


Thanks.  That leans me more towards DFI.

T
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]





Reply via email to