I agree with you. However the studio's right to protect their works ends
where my rights to copy, reverse engineer, modify, whatever begins.
I am anti-DRM.
No argument here. Look it's really simple folks - I am pro-property and
pro-privacy. I really do not understand why I am in the minority here. A
person should be able to do whatever he damn well feels like with a
purchased media copy within the confines of his home. Make copies,
reverse engineer, modify, whatever. It's your privacy, its your
property, it's your right. However you need to also understand the
author/distributor's work is also their property and their means of
making a living. Their work deserves the same amount of protection from
theft and exploitation that a purchaser of that work has. Is there
anybody here w
- Re: [H] Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. et al. v. Groks... Ben Ruset
-
