I have not used the tweak, but I can not find anything talking bad about it.
What is it saying is bad about it?

Bobby

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hayes Elkins
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 3:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [H] Ramdisk or ram drive in physical ram ?


Ditto. I was hoping not to called out and have to google the damn thing at 
work :)

>From: Thane Sherrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: The Hardware List <[email protected]>
>To: The Hardware List <[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: [H] Ramdisk or ram drive in physical ram ?
>Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:21:37 -0300
>
>At 03:14 PM 20/07/2005, Hayes Elkins wrote:
>>These kernel-in-memory tweak has also proven to be bunk.
>
>Thanks Hayes.  I thought I'd read that somewhere.  There is a page that 
>debunks a lot of those tweaks, but I can't remember the URL.
>
>T
>



Reply via email to