Your problem is you have failed to define working.  If by working you
mean are they acting as a deterrent, then they are working.  If you are
defining working as the complete eradication of drugs from society then
you are creating nothing more than a canard.

-Gary



Thane Sherrington said the following on 8/25/2005 2:58 PM:

> At 04:44 PM 25/08/2005, Hayes Elkins wrote:
>
>>> And that's one, not several.  Please give me some concrete examples
>>> of harsh drug laws having the desired effect over the long term.
>>
>>
>> Saudi Arabia - caught with drugs? Bye bye head.
>>
>> It's also a GREAT place to live.
>
>
> I think that proves my point.  Harsh drug laws just don't work. 
> Unless you feel that leaving in an oppressive regime with no drugs or
> alcohol is working.
>
> T

Reply via email to