At 01:34 PM 11/15/2005, Wayne Johnson wrote:
At 03:21 PM 11/15/2005, Julian Hale typed:
Hey, come on. Quit picking on Chuck just because you don't agree
with his decisions. It's his business, he can run it the way he wants.
I didn't write anything about subject other than what was posted but
why make these moral statements that just don't make sense like
At 09:37 AM 11/15/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
If out of ignorance I err on the side of caution, it may cost a
little more, but I can sleep at night knowing it will work.
How is that a moral statement??? I too will spend more money to get
a more reliable product, especially if it's for a customer. I'm not
saying that AMD products are less reliable, but they don't have the
lengthy history of Intel.
This is just an excuse to not do the research. If he wants to
operate his business that way fine. He states that he can sleep but
it doesn't stop him from complaining about how he can't compete
therefore everything is not so rosie. Every extra penny that he
spends on a machine costs his customer more & more. Sorry but them
is the facts whether they are sugar coated or not.
Nobody will be able to compete on the basis of price. There are
always going to be unscrupulous sellers peddling bottom of the barrel
product. Saving his customers a dollar here or a dollar there at the
potential sacrifice of reliability would be foolish. In fact, he may
be saving his customers in the long run, because they don't have to
spend money on service. He uses what he is familiar with, and
there's nothing wrong with that. It's almost like the stupid old
Chevy man/Ford man argument... All this aside, it's HIS DAMN
BUSINESS! I'm sure you wouldn't appreciate it if I came on here and
criticized your business decisions on a regular basis. All this
childish behavior directed towards Chuck is really starting to piss
me off, and I can't be the only one. Stop acting like school yard
bullies, and start acting your age.
Julian
