I use Virtual Server 2005 and Virtual PC 2004 at work, and VMware 5 at home.
I prefer VMware. I find it more configurable than the Microsoft solutions,
and more resource efficient. I do like Virtual Server's chainable
differencing disks...I'm not sure if VMware's server products offer a
similar feature.
Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Francisco Tapia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Hardware List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [H] VirtualPC??
Thanks :),
My IT helpdesk has informed me they will be putting in a purchase for
a virtual server 2005 software.
On 12/8/05, Ben Ruset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've played with some older versions of it. I *personally* am more of a
fan of VMWare as it seems to have better support for Linux.
Virtual PC on the Mac is incredibly slow.
Francisco Tapia wrote:
> Has anyone played with virtual PC?,
>
> I attended the Microsoft Launch on Dec 6th, and received some trial
> software that I wanted to try out, including the windows 2003
> enterprise w/ the tech preview of biztalk server. (not to menton the
> vs2005/sql2005 standard ed's
>
> from reading the docs on virtual pc, it sounds like the correct
> platform for me. this way I can try out sql2005 and vs2005 w/o
> affecting my current sql2000 and vs2003 installs.
>
> any advise or warnings?
> --
> -Francisco
> http://pcthis.blogspot.com |PC news with out the jargon!
> http://sqlthis.blogspot.com | Tsql and More...
>
>
--
-Francisco
http://pcthis.blogspot.com |PC news with out the jargon!
http://sqlthis.blogspot.com | Tsql and More...
